Consaul v. Rawlins
This text of 61 S.E. 704 (Consaul v. Rawlins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tlie plaintiffs brought suit to recover for services rendered by their intestate as an attorney at law, in the prosecution of a case in the Court of Claims of the United States, and relied for a recovery entirely upon a quantum meruit, all that part of the petition which counted upon the terms of a written contract having been stricken on demurrer. The evidence upon the trial showed that the plaintiffs’ demand was barred by the statute of limitations, more than four years having elapsed, after the time the alleged services were rendered, until institution of the suit; and the court, therefore, did not err in rendering a judgment of nonsuit, at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 S.E. 704, 130 Ga. 726, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consaul-v-rawlins-ga-1908.