Consalus v. . McConihe
14 N.E. 289, 107 N.Y. 659, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 1097
This text of 14 N.E. 289 (Consalus v. . McConihe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Consalus v. . McConihe, 14 N.E. 289, 107 N.Y. 659, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 1097 (N.Y. 1887).
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCargar & McKay v. Federal Securities Co.
284 P. 179 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1930)
McCargar v. Federal Securities Co.
293 P. 595 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit Union
233 P. 547 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
Washburn v. Interstate Investment Co.
36 P. 533 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1894)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 N.E. 289, 107 N.Y. 659, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 1097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consalus-v-mcconihe-ny-1887.