Cons v. Wipert

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cons v. Wipert

63 S.E.2d 370, 207 Ga. 621, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 463

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 14, 1951·No. No. 17345·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

Under the pleadings and evidence in this habeas corpus proceeding, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in awarding custody of the child to the foster parents. Code, §§ 50-121, 74-108 (3); Morris v. Grant, 196 Ga. 692 (27 S. E. 2d, 295).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Vincent P. McCauley and Charles A. Hughey, for plaintiff. Wohlwender & Land, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

Under the pleadings and evidence in this habeas corpus proceeding, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in awarding custody of the child to the foster parents. Code, §§ 50-121, 74-108 (3); Morris v. Grant, 196 Ga. 692 (27 S. E. 2d, 295).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Vincent P. McCauley and Charles A. Hughey, for plaintiff. Wohlwender & Land, for defendants.

Cons v. Wipert, 63 S.E.2d 370, 207 Ga. 621, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 463 (Ga. 1951).

Pincite

63 S.E.2d 370 (Cons v. Wipert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related