Cons v. Wipert

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cons v. Wipert

63 S.E.2d 370, 207 Ga. 621, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 463

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 14, 1951

DocketNo. 17345

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 S.E.2d 370 (Cons v. Wipert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cons v. Wipert, 63 S.E.2d 370, 207 Ga. 621, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 463 (Ga. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

Under the pleadings and evidence in this habeas corpus proceeding, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in awarding custody of the child to the foster parents. Code, §§ 50-121, 74-108 (3); Morris v. Grant, 196 Ga. 692 (27 S. E. 2d, 295).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Vincent P. McCauley and Charles A. Hughey, for plaintiff. Wohlwender & Land, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

Under the pleadings and evidence in this habeas corpus proceeding, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in awarding custody of the child to the foster parents. Code, §§ 50-121, 74-108 (3); Morris v. Grant, 196 Ga. 692 (27 S. E. 2d, 295).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Vincent P. McCauley and Charles A. Hughey, for plaintiff. Wohlwender & Land, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 S.E.2d 370, 207 Ga. 621, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cons-v-wipert-ga-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack