Conroy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedDecember 1, 2021
Docket20-131
StatusUnpublished

This text of Conroy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Conroy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conroy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0131V UNPUBLISHED

JULIA CONROY, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: October 26, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Influenza HUMAN SERVICES, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SIRVA)

Leigh Finfer, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On February 5, 2020, Julia Conroy filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (‘SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that was administered to her on September 28, 2018. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed on October 26, 2021, at ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccine in the United States, that she has experienced the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her alleged condition. Petition at 1, 3; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury, and denies that petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury and its residual effects were caused-in-fact by her flu vaccine. Respondent further denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on October 26, 2021, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $25,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

JULIA CONROY,

Petitioner,

V. No. 20-131V Chief Special Master Corcoran (SPU) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner Julia Conroy ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on September 28, 2018.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table and that her alleged shoulder condition is

actually caused by the vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual

effects of her injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury, and denies that

petitioner's alleged shoulder injury and its residual effects were caused-in-fact by her flu

vaccine. Respondent further denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner any other injury or her

current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $25,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l(a)(l ), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all

known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

2 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deitz v. High
109 S.E. 215 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Conroy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conroy-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2021.