Conroy v. LaGuardia
This text of 258 A.D. 222 (Conroy v. LaGuardia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whatever the status of petitioner (a clerk in the office of the clerk of the county of the Bronx) may be generally or under other specific statutes, rules and regulations, it seems clear that he is not, under Local Law 26 of 1937 (Administrative Code of the City of New York, § B40-6.1) a person “ in the service of the city * * * ” in a “ department of the city.” He, accordingly, is not entitled to the benefits of said law.
[223]*223The order, therefore, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 222, 15 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conroy-v-laguardia-nyappdiv-1939.