Conroy v. Conroy

585 So. 2d 957, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7867, 1991 WL 140866
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 1991
DocketNo. 90-2014
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 585 So. 2d 957 (Conroy v. Conroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conroy v. Conroy, 585 So. 2d 957, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7867, 1991 WL 140866 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The former wife moved the trial court to modify the final judgment of divorce which adopted a dissolution settlement agreement providing in pertinent part:

F. The Husband and the minor child shall have the right of liberal and reasonable contact with each other. Each party shall exercise good faith in promoting contact between the Husband and the child.
G. Neither party shall remove the child from the State of Florida for a period longer than thirty (30) days without the written consent of the other party.

The sole basis for the requested modification is the custodial parent’s desire to marry a New York resident and move with the parties’ minor child to that state. The trial court’s order granting the modification conflicts with Cole v. Cole, 530 So.2d 467 (Fla.5th DCA 1988); Jones v. Vrba, 513 So.2d 1080 (Fla.5th DCA 1987); and Giachetti v. Giachetti, 416 So.2d 27 (Fla.5th DCA 1982). For that reason we reverse and remand.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., COWART, J., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Urban v. Urban
600 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Dobson v. Samson
598 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 So. 2d 957, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7867, 1991 WL 140866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conroy-v-conroy-fladistctapp-1991.