Conroy v. City of Battle Creek

22 N.W.2d 275, 314 Mich. 210, 1946 Mich. LEXIS 400
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 1, 1946
DocketDocket No. 51, Calendar No. 43,262.
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 22 N.W.2d 275 (Conroy v. City of Battle Creek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conroy v. City of Battle Creek, 22 N.W.2d 275, 314 Mich. 210, 1946 Mich. LEXIS 400 (Mich. 1946).

Opinion

Butzel, C. J.

The city commission of the city of Battle Creek determined that a revaluation and reappraisal for assessment purposes of the property in the city should be made. On March 27, 1945, Cole-Layer Company of Dayton, Ohio, a copartnership, consisting of John D. Cole, Harold F. Layer and Melvin J. Trumble, herein for brevity called the company, made two written propositions addressed to the city assessor of Battle Creek in which *214 the company offered to furnish the services of experienced and qualified appraisers to appraise and revalue for assessment purposes all of the land and buildings and the public-utility properties in the city of Battle Creek. The propositions provided for' the development of analyzed unit costs for various materials, erected in place, which would include the cost of all the elements and services entering into construction of buildings. The company was to make a plat plan drawn to scale of each industrial plant, carefully describing thereon the buildings, which were to lie valued according to their component parts and also depreciated according to their age, condition and degree of utility. The total valué of industrial plants was to represent the sound utility value of the property for which-it was or might be used. These industrial plant appraisals were to be summarized, typed and bound and delivered to the city assessor. Appraisals of all the residences and the current residential costs in Battle Creek were to be investigated and analyzed. The unit costs were to form the basis for the residential appraisal schedules to be utilized in the appraisals of residential properties in Battle Creek. The schedules were to show the basic price per square foot of various types of houses of various construction and quality. The schedules were to be completed for various story heights of dwellings and to cover a range adequate for all types of houses. The various elements comprising cost were to be set forth with particularity; depreciation allowances were to be established and functional depreciation applied for obsolescence, design, lack of utility, local and other factors affecting the market value of each parcel of property. Record cards were to be made of the residential property and submitted to the city assessor to form the basis for the final assessed valuation.' In the same manner commercial properties *215 were to be valued, and all factors affecting the market value of parcels of land such as location, size and shape of parcels, and other factors were to be carefully considered. Depth tables and corner influence tables were to be developed for the valuation of lots. These tables were to be in accordance with the best practices of land valuation and were to be subject to the approval of the city assessor; the company to furnish him with an outline block map of the properties with unit land values clearly indicated. The company was likewise to furnish property record cards. The company also proposed the making of an appraisal of public utility properties, and an inventory of all physical equipment including appraisal of the component parts of electric distribution systems; all property to be inventoried, priced in detail and depreciated. In short, the city was to receive in detail a complete reappraisal and revaluation of all the property hereinbefore described in the city of Battle Creek, and to receive a system with proper cards, maps, et cetera, so that a modern current system could be established for proper assessments and future guidance. The result to be attained would be a uniform system of valuation for assessment purposes.

These propositions were accepted, and two months later a final written agreement was entered into embodying most of the provisions and proposals, but also omitting some of the features to which possible objection might be made. The written contract was executed by the company and the officers of the city in accordance with a resolution of the commission made on July 9,1945. It provided for the appraisal of all industrial, commercial and residential properties in the city of Battle Creek, as well as' the gas and electrical public utility systems consisting of their lands, buildings, machinery, equipment and distribution systems in the city of Battle Creek. It *216 also included the valuation of all land in the city. It distinctly provided that in the reappraisal and revaluation for assessment purposes of the properties, the Battle Creek city assessor was to act and .serve as appraiser in chief, and he was to make final decisions as to valuations, procedures and forms used in revaluation. Material and labor costs were to be determined as of such date as designated by the city assessor. The appraisals of all kinds were to be summarized, typed, bound and delivered to the city assessor of the city of Battle Creek. The company was to furnish him with an outline block map with unit land values clearly indicated. The depth tables, corner influence tables and valuation rules as developed by the company for the pricing of all lands in accordance with the best practices of land valuation were to be subject to the approval of the city assessor. The company was further, upon request, after it had completed its studies of land values, to attend any meetings of local realtors and land authorities in order to defend the unit front-foot acreage value established by the company, should such values be reviewed. Upon the approval of the unit values they were to form the basis for individual appraisal values by the company staff. The company further agreed to have its responsible head of the field organization present at the Battle Creek city board of review following the completion of the work in order to assist in the settlement of complaints and to defend the values placed upon the various properties by the city assessor. The city agreed to pay for this appraisal of the commercial, residential and industrial properties the sum of $33,800, and for the public utility properties $3,800, the amounts to be payable in monthly instalments at the rate of 90 per cent, of the estimated proportion of the work completed each month, and the *217 balance of 10 per cent, to be paid upon tbe completion of tbe appraisal, but upon tbe election of tbe city of Battle Creek it might defer tbe payment of one-tbird of tbe contract price until one year after tbe date of tbe contract.

We have not set forth all tbe other details of tbe contract, but tbe contract as a whole provided for a scientific reappraisal of all tbe real property in tbe city and tbe property of tbe public utility corporations. Tbe dominant and outstanding feature of tbe contract was that tbe revaluation was to be that of tbe city assessor.. Tbe company was to make tbe expert investigation and furnish him with tbe necessary expert information, records, and all other information as developed by scientific rules in order to give tbe city a complete reappraisal and revaluation compiled in a form easily kept current. Tbe commission subsequently appointed four nonresidents of tbe city, evidently nominees and employees of tbe company, as assistant assessors without salary in order to assist in obtaining tbe necessary information.

John Conroy, a resident taxpayer, filed a bill of complaint in which be sought to have tbe contract set aside as ultra vires, illegal and as an unlawful usurpation of tbe powers of tbe city not permitted by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WPW Acquisition Co. v. City of Troy
646 N.W.2d 487 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2002)
Rental Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Grand Rapids
566 N.W.2d 514 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1997)
Allied Supermarkets, Inc v. City of Detroit
216 N.W.2d 755 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1974)
Alco Universal Inc. v. City of Flint
192 N.W.2d 247 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1971)
Lochmoor Club v. City of Grosse Pointe Woods
143 N.W.2d 177 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1966)
Dooley v. City of Detroit
121 N.W.2d 724 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1963)
Freeze v. County of Pinellas
146 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Thomson v. City of Dearborn
106 N.W.2d 129 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1960)
People Ex Rel. Wexford County Prosecuting Attorney v. Kearney
77 N.W.2d 115 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1956)
Brennan v. Black
104 A.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1954)
Wright v. Bartz
62 N.W.2d 458 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1954)
Alexander v. Mayor and Bd. of Aldermen
68 So. 2d 434 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
Stocklan v. Brackett
61 A.2d 140 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1948)
Moran v. Grosse Pointe Township
26 N.W.2d 763 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1947)
Hays v. City of Kalamazoo
25 N.W.2d 787 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 N.W.2d 275, 314 Mich. 210, 1946 Mich. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conroy-v-city-of-battle-creek-mich-1946.