Conray Carroll v. Mike Huckabee

15 F. App'x 398
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 24, 2001
Docket01-1560
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 F. App'x 398 (Conray Carroll v. Mike Huckabee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conray Carroll v. Mike Huckabee, 15 F. App'x 398 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Conray Carroll appeals from the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record and appellant’s brief, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (de novo review), we agree with the district court that, for the reasons the court explained, the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and sought monetary relief from a defendant who is immune.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny all pending motions,

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. Huckabee, Governor of Arkansas
535 U.S. 1024 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 F. App'x 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conray-carroll-v-mike-huckabee-ca8-2001.