Conray Carroll v. Mike Huckabee

15 F. App'x 398

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Conray Carroll appeals from the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record and appellant’s brief, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (de novo review), we agree with the district court that, for the reasons the court explained, the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and sought monetary relief from a defendant who is immune.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny all pending motions,

1 . The Honorable William R. Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.