Conran v. State

17 So. 2d 82, 154 Fla. 227, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 667
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 29, 1944
StatusPublished

This text of 17 So. 2d 82 (Conran v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conran v. State, 17 So. 2d 82, 154 Fla. 227, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 667 (Fla. 1944).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted of perjury and on appeal here he questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. .We have considered the evidence and are of the opinion that it is insufficient to sustain the verdict, hence the judgment is therefore reversed.

Reversed.

BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 So. 2d 82, 154 Fla. 227, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conran-v-state-fla-1944.