Conrad v. Schmitz
3 N.E.2d 868, 272 N.Y. 459, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 952
Opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ. Finch, J., dissents in the following opinion in which Crane, Ch. J., concurs:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conrad v. Schmitz, 3 N.E.2d 868, 272 N.Y. 459, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 952 (N.Y. 1936).
3 N.E.2d 868 (Conrad v. Schmitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lamb v. S. Cheney & Son
125 N.E. 817 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Campbell v. . Gates
141 N.E. 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Hornstein v. Podwitz
173 N.E. 674 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Anderson v. Moskovitz
157 N.E. 601 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)