Conrad v. Schmitz
3 N.E.2d 868, 272 N.Y. 459, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 952
This text of 3 N.E.2d 868 (Conrad v. Schmitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conrad v. Schmitz, 3 N.E.2d 868, 272 N.Y. 459, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 952 (N.Y. 1936).
Opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ. Finch, J., dissents in the following opinion in which Crane, Ch. J., concurs:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lamb v. S. Cheney & Son
125 N.E. 817 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Campbell v. . Gates
141 N.E. 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Hornstein v. Podwitz
173 N.E. 674 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Anderson v. Moskovitz
157 N.E. 601 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.E.2d 868, 272 N.Y. 459, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conrad-v-schmitz-ny-1936.