Conrad v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission

492 A.2d 888
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMay 15, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 492 A.2d 888 (Conrad v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conrad v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission, 492 A.2d 888 (Me. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission disqualified the plaintiffs from receiving unemployment compensation because it determined that their former employer, Billen Shoe Company, Inc., had discharged them for misconduct. See 26 M.R. S.A. § 1193(2) (Supp.1984). The plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Superior Court, Androscoggin County, affirming the decision of the Commission. The Court is evenly divided on the question whether the decision of the Commission is correct.

Accordingly, the entry is:

By an evenly divided Court, judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1193
Maine § 1193(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 A.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conrad-v-maine-unemployment-insurance-commission-me-1985.