Conrad v. Lengel

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 406
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Conrad v. Lengel. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Ohio St. 532
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 10, 1924·No. No. 18217·Published

Opinion

MATTHIAS, J.

1. While by the provisions of Section 6351, General Code, an honorably discharged soldier procuring* a peddler’s license as therein provided is exempt from the payment of “any fee for a municipal or other license,” he is subject to the police regulations of the municipality, including a requirement that before he peddles or hawks merchandise therein he must obtain a license, and such license, under the express provisions of Section 6352, General Code, may be revoked and canceled for cause therein stated.

2. The arrest without a warrant by an officer of one found by such officer violating a statute or ordinance is authorized by Section 13492, General Code, and detention for the period of one hour without such warrant is not unreasonable.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conrad v. Lengel, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 406 (Ohio 1924).

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 406 (Conrad v. Lengel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.