Conrad v. Kennedy
This text of 51 S.E. 299 (Conrad v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In order to admit in evidence in this State a transcript of a will and its probate in another State of the Union, it is not sufficient that the clerk of the court where the probate was made shall certify under the seal of the court that the transcript is correct as appears of record in his office, but it is also necessary that the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate of the court shall certify that the attestation is in due form. Civil Code, § 5237’.
2. Where the correct rejection of a transcript of a will and its probate from another State necessitates the grant of a nonsuit, rulings as to other evidence, whether correct or erroneous, will not cause a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 S.E. 299, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conrad-v-kennedy-ga-1905.