Conrad v. Kennedy

51 S.E. 299, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 426
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 S.E. 299 (Conrad v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conrad v. Kennedy, 51 S.E. 299, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 426 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. In order to admit in evidence in this State a transcript of a will and its probate in another State of the Union, it is not sufficient that the clerk of the court where the probate was made shall certify under the seal of the court that the transcript is correct as appears of record in his office, but it is also necessary that the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate of the court shall certify that the attestation is in due form. Civil Code, § 5237’.

2. Where the correct rejection of a transcript of a will and its probate from another State necessitates the grant of a nonsuit, rulings as to other evidence, whether correct or erroneous, will not cause a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent. John M. Stubbs, S. B. Baker, and Akerman & Akerman, for plaintiff. William Faircloth, G-. U. Williams, W. F. Simmons and J. K. Hines, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buckner v. Endicott-Johnson Corp.
6 S.E.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 S.E. 299, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conrad-v-kennedy-ga-1905.