Conrad v. Kennedy

51 S.E. 299, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 426
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. In order to admit in evidence in this State a transcript of a will and its probate in another State of the Union, it is not sufficient that the clerk of the court where the probate was made shall certify under the seal of the court that the transcript is correct as appears of record in his office, but it is also necessary that the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate of the court shall certify that the attestation is in due form. Civil Code, § 5237’.

2. Where the correct rejection of a transcript of a will and its probate from another State necessitates the grant of a nonsuit, rulings as to other evidence, whether correct or erroneous, will not cause a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent. John M. Stubbs, S. B. Baker, and Akerman & Akerman, for plaintiff. William Faircloth, G-. U. Williams, W. F. Simmons and J. K. Hines, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conrad v. Kennedy, 51 S.E. 299, 123 Ga. 242, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 426 (Ga. 1905).

51 S.E. 299 (Conrad v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buckner v. Endicott-Johnson Corp.
6 S.E.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)