Conrad v. Broeker
61 A. 1118, 71 N.J.L. 341, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 185
Opinion
The state of the case furnished to the court discloses no exceptions authenticated by the judge upon which error has been assigned. For this omission the court deems it impossible to disturb the judgment, and it must therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray. 11.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conrad v. Broeker, 61 A. 1118, 71 N.J.L. 341, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 185 (N.J. 1904).
61 A. 1118 (Conrad v. Broeker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.