Conrad Seipp Brewing Co. v. Woolman
This text of 59 N.E. 1087 (Conrad Seipp Brewing Co. v. Woolman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for appellee insists9that the transcript shows on its face that no question is presented for review, for the reason that there is no seal attached to the certificate of the clerk. The certificate is signed by the clerk of the Lake Superior Court and states that the seal is affixed, but it is in fact without any such seal. As what purports to be a transcript of the record is not authenticated by the seal of the lower court, no question is presented. Fidelity, etc., Union v. Byrd, 154 Ind. 47; East Chicago, etc., Co. v. Siwy, 23 Ind. App. 564; Conkey v. Conder, 137 Ind. 411; Watson v. Finch, 150 Ind. 183; Carpenter v. Schaeffer, 154 Ind. 694; §§661, 7932 Burns 1894; Ewbank’s Manual, §117.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 N.E. 1087, 26 Ind. App. 642, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conrad-seipp-brewing-co-v-woolman-indctapp-1901.