Conraad Hoever v. R. Marks
This text of 977 F.3d 1203 (Conraad Hoever v. R. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 17-10792 ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cv-00549-MW-GRJ
CONRAAD L. HOEVER,
Plaintiff – Appellee-Cross Appellant,
versus
C. CARRAWAY, Correctional Officer, et al.,
Defendants,
R. MARKS, Correctional Officer, C. PAUL, Correctional Officer Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellants - Cross Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in
active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard
en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not
disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED
that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
977 F.3d 1203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conraad-hoever-v-r-marks-ca11-2020.