Conraad Hoever v. R. Marks

977 F.3d 1203
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 16, 2020·No. 17-10792·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10792

D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cv-00549-MW-GRJ

CONRAAD L. HOEVER,

Plaintiff – Appellee-Cross Appellant, versus

C. CARRAWAY, Correctional Officer, et al.,

Defendants,

R. MARKS, Correctional Officer, C. PAUL, Correctional Officer Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellants - Cross Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 2 of 2

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conraad Hoever v. R. Marks, 977 F.3d 1203 (11th Cir. 2020).

977 F.3d 1203 (Conraad Hoever v. R. Marks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conrad L. Hoever v. R. Marks
993 F.3d 1353 (Eleventh Circuit, 2021)