Conoway v. Short

Superior Court of Delaware

Conoway v. Short

3 Del. 342

DecidedJuly 5, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Del. 342 (Conoway v. Short) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conoway v. Short, 3 Del. 342 (Del. Ct. App. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

Ridgely and Brinchloe, for defendants, now filed an affidavit, and I moved a rule to show cause why the report should not be set aside;] but the court refused to lay the rule, on the ground that the applica-l tion was too late, the term to which the report was returned havingl elapsed without objection, and judgment having been rendered. Thel award of referees, approved by the court, is made by the law asl available as a verdict of a jury, which the court would not set asidel after the term had elapsed. (Dig. 112.)

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ridgely and Brinchloe, for defendants, now filed an affidavit, and I moved a rule to show cause why the report should not be set aside;] but the court refused to lay the rule, on the ground that the applica-l tion was too late, the term to which the report was returned havingl elapsed without objection, and judgment having been rendered. Thel award of referees, approved by the court, is made by the law asl available as a verdict of a jury, which the court would not set asidel after the term had elapsed. (Dig. 112.)

Rule refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Del. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conoway-v-short-delsuperct-1841.