Conover v. Suddath

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1016

TIMI ANN CONOVER,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROY SUDDATH,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-03299-AW)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Suddath, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roy Suddath appeals the district court’s orders

remanding this case back to state court and denying

reconsideration. Because the remand order was based on lack of

subject matter jurisdiction, the district court’s order is not

subject to review. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006); Things

Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28 (1995).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We further deny Suddath’s motion to seal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED