Conoscente v. Manfredi
This text of 191 Misc. 929 (Conoscente v. Manfredi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment should he affirmed, with $25 costs to respondent.
The appeals from the orders are dismissed. No order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict is contained in the record. An order denying a motion to reargue is not appeal-able. (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code [L. 1915, ch. 279], § 154; Lehman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 30 N. Y. S. 2d 716; Hygrade-Magnet Corp. v. Supino, 23 N. Y. S. 2d 55; Millstein v. Schwarts, 23 N. Y. S. 2d 357.)
MacCbate, Steinbrixii and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 Misc. 929, 82 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conoscente-v-manfredi-nyappterm-1948.