Connors v. Wilcox, No. Cv 94-0704871-S (Jun. 11, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Connors v. Wilcox, No. Cv 94-0704871-S (Jun. 11, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6629

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJune 11, 1999

DocketNo. CV 94-0704871-S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6629 (Connors v. Wilcox, No. Cv 94-0704871-S (Jun. 11, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connors v. Wilcox, No. Cv 94-0704871-S (Jun. 11, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6629 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM No costs are allowed to either party. The costs claimed by the plaintiff were incident to the law suit filed with a return date of October 31, 1993. That lawsuit never went to judgment. The court has confirmed the arbitration award in a proceeding brought pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes §§ 52-417,52-418 and 52-419 and Practice Book § 23-1.

The court's previous memorandum on the matter confirmed the arbitration by implication. The arbitration is explicitly confirmed. As to claims against David Wilcox, Sr., judgment is rendered in his favor in accordance with finding of arbitrator.

Kevin E. Booth, J. CT Page 6630

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM No costs are allowed to either party. The costs claimed by the plaintiff were incident to the law suit filed with a return date of October 31, 1993. That lawsuit never went to judgment. The court has confirmed the arbitration award in a proceeding brought pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes §§ 52-417,52-418 and 52-419 and Practice Book § 23-1.

The court's previous memorandum on the matter confirmed the arbitration by implication. The arbitration is explicitly confirmed. As to claims against David Wilcox, Sr., judgment is rendered in his favor in accordance with finding of arbitrator.

Kevin E. Booth, J. CT Page 6630

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connors-v-wilcox-no-cv-94-0704871-s-jun-11-1999-connsuperct-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack