Connors v. State
This text of 2014 Ark. App. 347 (Connors v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 347
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-13-635
Opinion Delivered June 4, 2014 DEANDRE CONNORS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTH DIVISION [NO. CR-11-3265] V. HONORABLE WENDELL GRIFFEN, JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEE WITHDRAW GRANTED
JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine)
with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use it to process or
pack a controlled substance. He was sentenced as a habitual offender to consecutive prison
terms totaling forty-one years in the Arkansas Department of Correction.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court
Rule 4-3(k),1 appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to be relieved, stating that there is no
merit to the appeal. The motion is accompanied by an abstract and addendum of the
proceedings below, including all objections and motions decided adversely to appellant, and
a brief in which counsel explains why there is nothing in the record that would support an
appeal. The clerk of this court served appellant with a copy of his counsel’s brief and notified
1 We note for the benefit of appellant’s counsel that this rule was amended in 2008, resulting in former Rule 4-3(j) being redesignated as 4-3(k). Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 347
him of his right to file a pro se statement of points for reversal within thirty days. Appellant
has filed no such statement.
From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with
Rule 4-3(k) and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw
is granted, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
HIXSON and WOOD, JJ., agree.
Danny R. Williams, for appellant.
No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ark. App. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connors-v-state-arkctapp-2014.