Connors v. Illinois

260 U.S. 695
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Connors v. Illinois. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 U.S. 695
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 4, 1922·No. 6·Published

Opinion

260 U.S. 695

43 S.Ct. 11

67 L.Ed. 468

John CONNORS, plaintiff in error,
v.
The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS. Edward O'DONNELL, plaintiff in error, v. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS. Leonard BANKS et al., plaintiff in error, v. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS. Frank BENDER, plaintiff in error, v. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS. John BOONE, plaintiff in error, v. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS. William TAGLIA, plaintiff in error, v. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS. Abe SCHAFFNER, plaintiff in error, v. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS. George MORAN, plaintiff in error, v. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS.

No. 6.

No. 7.

No. 8.

No. 9.

No. 10.

No. 11.

No. 23.

No. 57.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 9, 1922

Mr. Rush B. Johnson, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff in error Connors.

Messrs. Edward J. Brundage, Atty. Gen., Edward C. Fitch, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert E. Crowe, State's Atty., of Chicago, Ill., for the People of State of Illinois.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71, 23 Sup. Ct. 28, 47 L. Ed. 79; Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U. S. 481, 485, 28 Sup. Ct. 372, 52 L. Ed. 582.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connors v. Illinois, 260 U.S. 695 (1922).

260 U.S. 695 (Connors v. Illinois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dreyer v. Illinois
187 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Ughbanks v. Armstrong
208 U.S. 481 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Connors v. Illinois
260 U.S. 695 (Supreme Court, 1922)