Connors Ex Rel. Connors v. Goeking

Missouri Court of Appeals

Connors Ex Rel. Connors v. Goeking

283 S.W.3d 826, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 669

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 19, 2009

DocketWD 69556

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 826 (Connors Ex Rel. Connors v. Goeking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connors Ex Rel. Connors v. Goeking, 283 S.W.3d 826, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 669 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michelle Connors, as the next friend of her daughter Baeleigh Connors, appeals the trial court’s judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of defendants Charles Keith Goeking, M.D., Kathryn Shea, R.N., and Heartland Regional Medical Center. On appeal, Connors claims that the trial court erred in excluding two hospital records from evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michelle Connors, as the next friend of her daughter Baeleigh Connors, appeals the trial court’s judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of defendants Charles Keith Goeking, M.D., Kathryn Shea, R.N., and Heartland Regional Medical Center. On appeal, Connors claims that the trial court erred in excluding two hospital records from evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 S.W.3d 826, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connors-ex-rel-connors-v-goeking-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack