Connor v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Connor v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 359, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 21, 1951

DocketNo. 56056; protest 162484-K (Baltimore)

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 359 (Connor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connor v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 359, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of aluminum scrap; that said scrap is a nonferrous material in chief value of metal; and that it is secondhand or waste or refuse, fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of aluminum scrap; that said scrap is a nonferrous material in chief value of metal; and that it is secondhand or waste or refuse, fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Cust. Ct. 359, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connor-v-united-states-cusc-1951.