Connor v. United States

293 F. 391, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 1626
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 11, 1923·No. No. 4095·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an indictment in two counts. The first-count charges the unlawful possession, on January 18, 1923, of intoxicating liquor. For the purpose of affecting the punishment, it also alleges the dates of two prior convictions of the plaintiff in error. The [392]*392second count charges the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor "at the time and place” alleged in the first count. Plaintiff in error was convicted under the second count. Failure to allege a date in the second count is the sole error assigned.

It is permissible to refer to other parts of an indictment, and from one count to another, to fix a date. 22 C. J. 318, 366. The reference in the second count is clearly to the date alleged in the first count which charged the unlawful possession for which the plaintiff in error was being prosecuted, and not to the dates involved in the former prosecutions and convictions. However, all dates mentioned were within the statute of limitations.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connor v. United States, 293 F. 391, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 1626 (5th Cir. 1923).

293 F. 391 (Connor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parmagini v. United States
42 F.2d 721 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)