Connor v. Siebert

New York Court of Appeals

Connor v. Siebert

436 N.E.2d 1316, 56 N.Y.2d 674, 451 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3342

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 4, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 436 N.E.2d 1316 (Connor v. Siebert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connor v. Siebert, 436 N.E.2d 1316, 56 N.Y.2d 674, 451 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3342 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

[676]*676OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

It was not an abuse of discretion as a matter of law for the Appellate Division to decline to entertain these actions for declaratory judgments on the ground that “no justiciable controversy exists upon which [the court] can properly rule” (CPLR 3001; New York Public Interest Research Group v Carey, 42 NY2d 527).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

In each case: Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI