Connor v. Robbins
This text of 151 S.E.2d 573 (Connor v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no error in overruling the motion by the defendant for judgment of nonsuit. The plaintiff’s evidence, which the jury believed, was sufficient to establish the cause of action alleged in her complaint. Conflicts between her evidence and that of the defendant were for the jury to determine. The plaintiff’s evidence, considered alone, does not show contributory negligence by her. The defendant's evidence may not be considered as a basis for judgment of nonsuit on the ground of contributory negligence. Pruett v. Inman, 252 N.C. 520, 114 S.E. 2d 360.
We have carefully considered the exceptions by the defendant to the charge of the court to the jury and find no error therein.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 S.E.2d 573, 268 N.C. 709, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connor-v-robbins-nc-1966.