Connor v. Elliott

74 So. 649, 73 Fla. 217, 1917 Fla. LEXIS 428
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 So. 649 (Connor v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connor v. Elliott, 74 So. 649, 73 Fla. 217, 1917 Fla. LEXIS 428 (Fla. 1917).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The appellee filed her bill to foreclose a mortgage given by Rubie C. Connor and her husband to James M. Elliott in 1908. Separate demurrers were interposed to the bill by the several defendants, which demurrers were overruled! From the order an appeal was taken. The questions presented have been discussed in the case of Ocklawaha River Farms Company v. Jefferson D. Young, et al., decided this day.

The order of the Chancellor overruling the demurrer is affirmed upon the authority of that case.

[219]*219Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell v. Henslee
132 So. 489 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Herald v. Hardin
116 So. 863 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Conner v. Elliott
79 Fla. 513 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 So. 649, 73 Fla. 217, 1917 Fla. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connor-v-elliott-fla-1917.