Connor v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Florida

Connor v. Elliott

74 So. 649, 73 Fla. 217, 1917 Fla. LEXIS 428

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 31, 1917·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The appellee filed her bill to foreclose a mortgage given by Rubie C. Connor and her husband to James M. Elliott in 1908. Separate demurrers were interposed to the bill by the several defendants, which demurrers were overruled! From the order an appeal was taken. The questions presented have been discussed in the case of Ocklawaha River Farms Company v. Jefferson D. Young, et al., decided this day.

The order of the Chancellor overruling the demurrer is affirmed upon the authority of that case.

[219]*219Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellee filed her bill to foreclose a mortgage given by Rubie C. Connor and her husband to James M. Elliott in 1908. Separate demurrers were interposed to the bill by the several defendants, which demurrers were overruled! From the order an appeal was taken. The questions presented have been discussed in the case of Ocklawaha River Farms Company v. Jefferson D. Young, et al., decided this day.

The order of the Chancellor overruling the demurrer is affirmed upon the authority of that case.

[219]*219Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Connor v. Elliott, 74 So. 649, 73 Fla. 217, 1917 Fla. LEXIS 428 (Fla. 1917).

Pincite

74 So. 649 (Connor v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related