Connor v. California

313 U.S. 542, 61 S. Ct. 844
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 14, 1941
DocketNo. 922
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 313 U.S. 542 (Connor v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connor v. California, 313 U.S. 542, 61 S. Ct. 844 (1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Frank S. Connor, pro se.

The appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is also denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karis v. Vasquez
828 F. Supp. 1449 (E.D. California, 1993)
Silvestris v. Silvestris
24 A.D.2d 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Jackson v. State
392 P.2d 695 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1964)
People v. Guber
201 Misc. 852 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1952)
Commonwealth Piccerelli v. Smith, Warden
27 A.2d 484 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
313 U.S. 542, 61 S. Ct. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connor-v-california-scotus-1941.