Connor v. Bayne

150 A.2d 445, 219 Md. 506, 1959 Md. LEXIS 380
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 15, 1959
DocketNo. 181
StatusPublished

This text of 150 A.2d 445 (Connor v. Bayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connor v. Bayne, 150 A.2d 445, 219 Md. 506, 1959 Md. LEXIS 380 (Md. 1959).

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The point here raised on motion for summary judgment as to whether Code (1957), Art. 93, Sec. 112, is a remedial or substantive statute of limitations, is the same as that raised on demurrer and decided in Chandlee v. Shockley, 219 Md. 493. We regard that case as controlling.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandlee v. Shockley
150 A.2d 438 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 A.2d 445, 219 Md. 506, 1959 Md. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connor-v-bayne-md-1959.