Connoly v. Cunningham

2 Wash. Terr. 251

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Connoly v. Cunningham. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Wash. Terr. 242 →

Washington Territory·Decided July 15, 1884·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Greene, Chief Justice.

This cause has been submitted as turning upon the same facts as appear in the appeal case of Connoly v. Cunningham et al., in which the opinion of the Court was filed this morning.

The same law is applicable in this cause as in that, with an analogous result.

Accordingly, -the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

We concur: George Turner, Associate Justice.

S. C. Wingard, Associate Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Greene, Chief Justice.

This cause has been submitted as turning upon the same facts as appear in the appeal case of Connoly v. Cunningham et al., in which the opinion of the Court was filed this morning.

The same law is applicable in this cause as in that, with an analogous result.

Accordingly, -the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

We concur: George Turner, Associate Justice.

S. C. Wingard, Associate Justice.

Connoly v. Cunningham, 2 Wash. Terr. 251 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1884).

Pincite

2 Wash. Terr. 251 (Connoly v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.