Connolly v. Waycott

63 N.H. 618
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 63 N.H. 618 (Connolly v. Waycott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connolly v. Waycott, 63 N.H. 618 (N.H. 1884).

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

No question of law is presented. Whether the labor was performed upon the credit of the defendant, or upon that of Knapp, was a question of fact. •

Exceptions overruled.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.H. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connolly-v-waycott-nh-1884.