Connolly v. Long Island Power Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Connolly v. Long Island Power Authority

141 A.D.3d 555, 34 N.Y.S.3d 902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 2016

Docket2014-09084

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 141 A.D.3d 555 (Connolly v. Long Island Power Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connolly v. Long Island Power Authority, 141 A.D.3d 555, 34 N.Y.S.3d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinions

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the defendants Long Island Power Authority and Long Island Lighting Company appeal, and the defendant National Grid Electric Services, LLC, separately appeals, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Siegal, J.), entered July [556]*55615, 2014, which denied their joint motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against, among others, the Long Island Power Authority (hereinafter LIPA), a public authority (see Public Authorities Law § 1020 et seq.), the Long Island Lighting Company (hereinafter LILCO), previously a private electric company and now allegedly a wholly owned subsidiary of LIPA, and National Grid Electric Services, LLC (hereinafter NGES and collectively with LIPA and LILCO, the defendants), LIPA’s private contractor responsible for operating LIPA’s electrical transmission and distribution system. The plaintiffs seek to recover damages for the destruction of their real and personal property located on the Rockaway Peninsula in Queens, which they allege occurred because the defendants negligently failed to preemptively de-energize the Rockaway Peninsula prior to or during Hurricane Sandy on October 29, 2012. The defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that LIPA was immune from liability based on the doctrine of governmental function immunity, and that LILCO and NGES were entitled to the same governmental immunity defense as LIPA. The Supreme Court denied the motion. The defendants appeal.

The denial of the defendants’ motion was proper for the reasons stated in Heeran v Long Is. Power Auth. (LIPA) (141 AD3d 561 [2016] [decided herewith]).

Balkin, J.P., Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the defendants Long Island Power Authority and Long Island Lighting Company appeal, and the defendant National Grid Electric Services, LLC, separately appeals, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Siegal, J.), entered July [556]*55615, 2014, which denied their joint motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against, among others, the Long Island Power Authority (hereinafter LIPA), a public authority (see Public Authorities Law § 1020 et seq.), the Long Island Lighting Company (hereinafter LILCO), previously a private electric company and now allegedly a wholly owned subsidiary of LIPA, and National Grid Electric Services, LLC (hereinafter NGES and collectively with LIPA and LILCO, the defendants), LIPA’s private contractor responsible for operating LIPA’s electrical transmission and distribution system. The plaintiffs seek to recover damages for the destruction of their real and personal property located on the Rockaway Peninsula in Queens, which they allege occurred because the defendants negligently failed to preemptively de-energize the Rockaway Peninsula prior to or during Hurricane Sandy on October 29, 2012. The defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that LIPA was immune from liability based on the doctrine of governmental function immunity, and that LILCO and NGES were entitled to the same governmental immunity defense as LIPA. The Supreme Court denied the motion. The defendants appeal.

The denial of the defendants’ motion was proper for the reasons stated in Heeran v Long Is. Power Auth. (LIPA) (141 AD3d 561 [2016] [decided herewith]).

Balkin, J.P., Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A.D.3d 555, 34 N.Y.S.3d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connolly-v-long-island-power-authority-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack