Connolly v. Halliwell-Shelton Electric Corp.
This text of 232 A.D. 829 (Connolly v. Halliwell-Shelton Electric Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appealing defendant to answer within ten days from service of a copy of- the order herein. The complaint sufficiently states a cause of action in negligence, upon which theory the appellant may be held liable to the plaintiff for injuries she received in the use of the machine which the appellant manufactured and sold to a dealer from whom the plaintiff’s employers purchased it. (MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N. Y. 382; Statler v. Ray Mfg. Co., 195 id. 478.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connolly-v-halliwell-shelton-electric-corp-nyappdiv-1931.