Connolly v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Co. of Buffalo
This text of 169 A. 690 (Connolly v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Co. of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the opinion below for the reasons given by YiceChancellor Fallon in his opinion. We have nothing to add excepting this: We have' examined the contention of the
appellant that “the counsel fee allowed to counsel for the respondent is excessive.” We think it is not. It was $250, and in the circumstances disclosed by the record was quite justified. The respondent is entitled to costs in this court.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 A. 690, 115 N.J. Eq. 74, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connolly-v-guardian-casualty-insurance-co-of-buffalo-nj-1934.