Connolly v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Co. of Buffalo

169 A. 690, 115 N.J. Eq. 74, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 726
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 5, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 169 A. 690 (Connolly v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Co. of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connolly v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Co. of Buffalo, 169 A. 690, 115 N.J. Eq. 74, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 726 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the opinion below for the reasons given by YiceChancellor Fallon in his opinion. We have nothing to add excepting this: We have' examined the contention of the

appellant that “the counsel fee allowed to counsel for the respondent is excessive.” We think it is not. It was $250, and in the circumstances disclosed by the record was quite justified. The respondent is entitled to costs in this court.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coursen v. Coursen
252 A.2d 738 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Beekwilder v. Beekwilder
102 A.2d 642 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A. 690, 115 N.J. Eq. 74, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connolly-v-guardian-casualty-insurance-co-of-buffalo-nj-1934.