Connolly v. Deutsche Bank AG

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 22, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-09811·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn ee KX MATTHEW CONNOLLY, : Plaintiff, : : 22-CV-9811 (JMF) -v- : : ORDER DEUTSCHE BANK AG, : Defendant. :

wn ee KX JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Tn light of Judge McMahon’s March 14, 2023 Order and the presumption of public access, see Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006), the Court assumes that the Amended Complaint should be unsealed in its entirety. Any objection or request to maintain any redaction — by a party or the Government — shall be filed by March 24, 2023. Absent such objection or request, the Amended Complaint will be unsealed in its entirety without further notice. Additionally, the parties’ proposed briefing schedule for the motion to dismiss is hereby adopted. Accordingly: e Defendant shall file an answer, a new motion to dismiss, or a letter on ECF stating that it relies on the previously filed motion to dismiss by April 3, 2023. e If Defendant files a new motion to dismiss, any opposition shall be filed within four weeks or no later than May 1, 2023. e Any reply shall be filed within three weeks of the opposition or no later than May 22, 2023. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 22, 2023 New York, New York JESSEM4-FURMAN nited States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connolly v. Deutsche Bank AG, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Connolly v. Deutsche Bank AG (Connolly v. Deutsche Bank AG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)