Connolly v. Connolly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Connolly v. Connolly

282 A.D.2d 703, 724 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4228

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 A.D.2d 703 (Connolly v. Connolly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connolly v. Connolly, 282 A.D.2d 703, 724 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered June 19, 1996, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), dated June 9, 2000, which, in effect, denied his motion to resettle a Qualified Domestic Relations Order dated May 1, 1998, to conform it to the terms of the parties’ stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An order denying a motion to resettle the substantive or decretal portions of a prior order is not appealable (see, Scopelliti v Scopelliti, 250 AD2d 752). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered June 19, 1996, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), dated June 9, 2000, which, in effect, denied his motion to resettle a Qualified Domestic Relations Order dated May 1, 1998, to conform it to the terms of the parties’ stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An order denying a motion to resettle the substantive or decretal portions of a prior order is not appealable (see, Scopelliti v Scopelliti, 250 AD2d 752). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 703, 724 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connolly-v-connolly-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack