Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided March 13, 2025·No. 4:23-cv-00526·Unknown

Opinion

Clarissa Connolly, ) No. CV 23-526-TUC-JAS (LCK) Plaintiff, ORDER Vs.

Commissioner of Social Security, ) ° Defendant. ) OO Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is accepted and adopted. (2) This case is remanded back to the ALJ for a new hearing and further proceedings as discussed in the Report and Recommendation. (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case. Dated this 13th day of March, 2025. _\ C. Ast > Honorable James A. Soto United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, (D. Ariz. 2025).

Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conley v. Crabtree
14 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (D. Oregon, 1998)
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp.
170 F.3d 734 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)