Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

D. Arizona

Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

DecidedMarch 13, 2025

Docket4:23-cv-00526

StatusUnknown

This text of Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, (D. Ariz. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 5 || Clarissa Connolly, ) No. CV 23-526-TUC-JAS (LCK) 6 Plaintiff, ORDER 7 | Vs.

Commissioner of Social Security, ) ° Defendant. 10 ) 11 OO 12 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 13 || Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any 14 || objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 15 || As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed 16 || the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ recommendations are not clearly 17 || erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 18 | 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 19 | 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins 20 || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is accepted and adopted. (2) This case is remanded 21 || back to the ALJ for a new hearing and further proceedings as discussed in the Report and 22 || Recommendation. (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case. 23 || Dated this 13th day of March, 2025. 24 25 26 _\ C. Ast > 27 Honorable James A. Soto 28 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 5 || Clarissa Connolly, ) No. CV 23-526-TUC-JAS (LCK) 6 Plaintiff, ORDER 7 | Vs.

Commissioner of Social Security, ) ° Defendant. 10 ) 11 OO 12 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 13 || Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any 14 || objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 15 || As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed 16 || the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ recommendations are not clearly 17 || erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 18 | 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 19 | 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins 20 || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is accepted and adopted. (2) This case is remanded 21 || back to the ALJ for a new hearing and further proceedings as discussed in the Report and 22 || Recommendation. (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case. 23 || Dated this 13th day of March, 2025. 24 25 26 _\ C. Ast > 27 Honorable James A. Soto 28 United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connolly-v-commissioner-of-social-security-administration-azd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack