Connolly v. City of Boston
Opinion
The plaintiff’s own testimony showed that he was travelling on the Lord’s day on a matter of his own secular [65]*65business, and not from the pressure of any “necessity” upon himself, or “ charity ” towards any other person, upon any possible interpretation of those words. He cannot therefore maintain this action. Gen. Sts. c. 84, § 2. Bosworth v. Swansey, 10 Met. 363. Jones v. Andover, 10 Allen, 18. Stanton v. Metropolitan Railroad, 14 Allen, 485. Commonwealth v. Sampson, 97 Mass. 407. Commonwealth v. Josselyn, Ib. 411. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
117 Mass. 64 (Connolly v. City of Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.