Connolly v. Bouck
160 F. 1022, 87 C.C.A. 678, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4298
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Connolly v. Bouck. Read the opinion of the Court — 174 F. 312 →
Opinion
The appeal in this case is dismissed, upon the ground that the decree which it challenges is an interlocutory and not a final decree, upon the authority of Railway Company v. Simmons, 123 U. S. 52, 8 Sup. Ct. 58, 31 L. Ed. 73, Parsons v. Robinson, 122 U. S. 112, 7 Sup. Ct. 1153, 30 L. Ed. 1122, Chase v. Driver, 92 Fed. 780, 783, 784, 34 C. C. A. 668, 671, 672, and the cases there cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connolly v. Bouck, 160 F. 1022, 87 C.C.A. 678, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4298 (8th Cir. 1908).
160 F. 1022 (Connolly v. Bouck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parsons v. Robinson
122 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. v. Simmons
123 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Chase v. Driver
92 F. 780 (Eighth Circuit, 1899)