Connolly v. Bouck

Eighth Circuit

Connolly v. Bouck

160 F. 1022, 87 C.C.A. 678, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4298

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 9, 1908

DocketNo. 2,498

StatusPublished

This text of 160 F. 1022 (Connolly v. Bouck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connolly v. Bouck, 160 F. 1022, 87 C.C.A. 678, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4298 (8th Cir. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case is dismissed, upon the ground that the decree which it challenges is an interlocutory and not a final decree, upon the authority of Railway Company v. Simmons, 123 U. S. 52, 8 Sup. Ct. 58, 31 L. Ed. 73, Parsons v. Robinson, 122 U. S. 112, 7 Sup. Ct. 1153, 30 L. Ed. 1122, Chase v. Driver, 92 Fed. 780, 783, 784, 34 C. C. A. 668, 671, 672, and the cases there cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case is dismissed, upon the ground that the decree which it challenges is an interlocutory and not a final decree, upon the authority of Railway Company v. Simmons, 123 U. S. 52, 8 Sup. Ct. 58, 31 L. Ed. 73, Parsons v. Robinson, 122 U. S. 112, 7 Sup. Ct. 1153, 30 L. Ed. 1122, Chase v. Driver, 92 Fed. 780, 783, 784, 34 C. C. A. 668, 671, 672, and the cases there cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 F. 1022, 87 C.C.A. 678, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connolly-v-bouck-ca8-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack