Connoe v. Suncrest Lumber Co.
123 S.E. 88, 187 N.C. 863
Opinion
Upon warmly contested issues of fact, tbe jury returned a verdict in favor of tbe plaintiff. We bave found no sufficient reason for disturbing tbe result of tbe trial. Hence' tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.
Tbe record presents no new or novel point of law not heretofore settled by our decisions, and it would only be a work of supererogation, or “threshing over old straw,” to discuss tbe exceptions, seriatim. No error has been made to appear.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connoe v. Suncrest Lumber Co., 123 S.E. 88, 187 N.C. 863 (N.C. 1924).
123 S.E. 88 (Connoe v. Suncrest Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Greene
258 S.E.2d 71 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Johnson
210 S.E.2d 260 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)