Connoe v. Suncrest Lumber Co.
This text of 123 S.E. 88 (Connoe v. Suncrest Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon warmly contested issues of fact, tbe jury returned a verdict in favor of tbe plaintiff. We bave found no sufficient reason for disturbing tbe result of tbe trial. Hence' tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.
Tbe record presents no new or novel point of law not heretofore settled by our decisions, and it would only be a work of supererogation, or “threshing over old straw,” to discuss tbe exceptions, seriatim. No error has been made to appear.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 S.E. 88, 187 N.C. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connoe-v-suncrest-lumber-co-nc-1924.