Connie Hinojosa v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 22, 2018
Docket01-17-00824-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Connie Hinojosa v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (Connie Hinojosa v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connie Hinojosa v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Memorandum Order issued February 22, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00824-CV ——————————— CONNIE HINOJOSA, Appellant V. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, FIRST TRANSIT, INC., AND MERICA EUBANKS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016-48853

MEMORANDUM ORDER Appellant, Connie Hinojosa, has filed a partial motion to dismiss her appeal

against appellees First Transit, Inc. and Merica Eubanks, and further requests that

this Court assess costs against the party that incurred them. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1), (b), (d). Appellant states that she continues to pursue her appeal against appellee Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas. While the

certificate of conference attached to the motion to dismiss indicates that no

response had been received from appellees’ counsel, this motion has been on file

with this Court for more than ten days, and no party has responded to the motion.

See id. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no

opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal against appellees

First Transit, Inc. and Merica Eubanks, with costs to be taxed against the party who

incurred the same. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (d), 43.2(f). The appeal against appellee

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas, remains pending. See id.

42.1(b).

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Higley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connie Hinojosa v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connie-hinojosa-v-metropolitan-transit-authority-of-harris-county-texas-texapp-2018.