Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc. The American Arbitration Association

413 F.3d 1024, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 12782, 2005 WL 1515082
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc. The American Arbitration Association. Read the opinion of the Court — 469 F.3d 1257
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2005·No. 03-15955·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc. The American Arbitration Association, 413 F.3d 1024, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 12782, 2005 WL 1515082 (9th Cir. 2005).

413 F.3d 1024 (Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc. The American Arbitration Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.