Conners v. Wagner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Conners v. Wagner

211 Ill. App. 413

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 14, 1918

DocketGen. No. 23,568

StatusPublished

This text of 211 Ill. App. 413 (Conners v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conners v. Wagner, 211 Ill. App. 413 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13* — when judgment on insufficient statement of claim not validated. Where a statement of claim was insufficient to state a cause of action, a judgment thereon for plaintiff after a trial had in the absence of defendants could not be given vitality by the filing, with leave of court, of an amended statement of claim after the entry of judgment. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13* — what amendment of statement of claim not allowed after judgment. Where the original statement of claim was insufficient to state a cause of action, an amendment is equivalent to setting up a new cause .of action and is not allowable after judgment. 4. Pleadings, § 248* — what amendments permitted after judgment. Amendments of pleadings after judgment are permitted by statute for defects or imperfections in matters of form, but not as to substance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13* — when judgment on insufficient statement of claim not validated. Where a statement of claim was insufficient to state a cause of action, a judgment thereon for plaintiff after a trial had in the absence of defendants could not be given vitality by the filing, with leave of court, of an amended statement of claim after the entry of judgment. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13* — what amendment of statement of claim not allowed after judgment. Where the original statement of claim was insufficient to state a cause of action, an amendment is equivalent to setting up a new cause .of action and is not allowable after judgment. 4. Pleadings, § 248* — what amendments permitted after judgment. Amendments of pleadings after judgment are permitted by statute for defects or imperfections in matters of form, but not as to substance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 Ill. App. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conners-v-wagner-illappct-1918.