Conners v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Conners v. State

1914 OK CR 97, 140 P. 1195, 10 Okla. Crim. 695, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 25, 1914

DocketNo. A-2074.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 97 (Conners v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conners v. State, 1914 OK CR 97, 140 P. 1195, 10 Okla. Crim. 695, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Conners, was convicted at the March, 1913, term of the county court of- Canadian county on a charge of having unlawful possession of ixffcoxieating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a term of six months and a fine of $500. Judgment was pronounced by the trial court on the 27th day of May, 1913, at which time plaintiff in error was given thirty days to prepare and serve case-made, and sixty days within whieh to lodge his appeal in the Criminal Court of Appeals. The appeal was filed in this court on the 23d day of August, 1913, more tl^an sixty days after the rendition of the judgment, no order having been made by the trial court extending the time beyond sixty days. An appeal is taken to this court by filing a petition in error *696 and attaching a case-made. In this case it appears that the case-made was filed 'in July; that the petition in error was not filed until the 23d of August. The appeal, therefore, was not perfected in the manner provided by law. We, therefore, have no jurisdiction to determine any of the questions raised or attempted to be raised and have jurisdiction only to dismiss the appeal and direct the trial court to enforce the judgment, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Conners, was convicted at the March, 1913, term of the county court of- Canadian county on a charge of having unlawful possession of ixffcoxieating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a term of six months and a fine of $500. Judgment was pronounced by the trial court on the 27th day of May, 1913, at which time plaintiff in error was given thirty days to prepare and serve case-made, and sixty days within whieh to lodge his appeal in the Criminal Court of Appeals. The appeal was filed in this court on the 23d day of August, 1913, more tl^an sixty days after the rendition of the judgment, no order having been made by the trial court extending the time beyond sixty days. An appeal is taken to this court by filing a petition in error *696 and attaching a case-made. In this case it appears that the case-made was filed 'in July; that the petition in error was not filed until the 23d of August. The appeal, therefore, was not perfected in the manner provided by law. We, therefore, have no jurisdiction to determine any of the questions raised or attempted to be raised and have jurisdiction only to dismiss the appeal and direct the trial court to enforce the judgment, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 97, 140 P. 1195, 10 Okla. Crim. 695, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conners-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.