Conners v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Conners v. State

503 S.W.3d 329, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1162, 2016 WL 6695796

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 2016·No. No. ED 104049·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Conners appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Conners appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Conners v. State, 503 S.W.3d 329, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1162, 2016 WL 6695796 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

503 S.W.3d 329 (Conners v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.