Conner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 18, 2010·No. 2010-5106·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit DONNA MARIE CONNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. UNITED STATES, Defen,dant-Appellee. 2010-5106 Appeal from the United States Court of Federa1 Claims in case no. 09-CV-880, Senior Judge Robert H. Hodges, Jr. ON MOTION ORDER D0nna Marie Conner moves for "affirmative re1ief" and other relief. Conner also submits a “supplementary pleading." The United States moves to waive its obliga- tion to respond to Conner's filings The arguments and assertions in Conner's motion and "pleading" involve the merits of her case. Such arguments and assertions should be included in the briefs. Briefing is now completed

CONNER V. US Upon consideration thereof, IT Is 0RDERED THAT: (1) Conner’s motion is denied. (2) The United States’ motion NOV 1 8 2010 Date ccc Donna Marie Conner Russell J. Upton, Esq. s8 2 is denied as moot. FoR THE C0URT /s/ J an Horbal__v J an Horbaly _ Clerk lLED u.s. courrl:oF APPzALs ron in-le FEoERAL concur NOV. 1 8 2010 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conner v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Conner v. United States (Conner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.