Conner v. State
This text of 111 S.W.2d 266 (Conner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is conspiracy to commit the offense of swindling; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary 'for three years.
The companion case of Baker v. State is found reported in 72 South Western, Second Series, at page 296.
The facts adduced upon the trial in the present case were substantially the same as those set forth in the opinion in Baker v. State, supra.
The averments in the indictments in the present case and the companion case are substantially the same. Suffice it to say we held that the indictment in the companion case sufficiently charged the offense, and affirmed the judgment of conviction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 S.W.2d 266, 133 Tex. Crim. 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.