Conner v. State

18 Ind. 428
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record does not show that the grand jury, by whom the indictment was found, were regularly empanneled, nor that they hied the indictment. A legal indictment is therefore not shown.

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conner v. State, 18 Ind. 428 (Ind. 1862).

18 Ind. 428 (Conner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rinkard v. State
62 N.E. 14 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
Heacock v. State
42 Ind. 393 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Bailey v. State
39 Ind. 438 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)