Conner v. State

101 S.E. 815, 24 Ga. App. 654, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 434
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 6, 1920·No. 11020·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

While the evidence in this case was conflicting upon the material issues, and would have authorized the defendant’s acquittal, it also authorized his conviction; and the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, ^tliis court is without authority to interfere. Bor a ease similar in several material respects, see Garner v. State, 100 Ga. 257 (28 S. E. 24).

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conner v. State, 101 S.E. 815, 24 Ga. App. 654, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 434 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

101 S.E. 815 (Conner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garner v. State
28 S.E. 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)