Conner v. State

101 S.E. 815, 24 Ga. App. 654, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 434
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 6, 1920
Docket11020
StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 815 (Conner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conner v. State, 101 S.E. 815, 24 Ga. App. 654, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 434 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

While the evidence in this case was conflicting upon the material issues, and would have authorized the defendant’s acquittal, it also authorized his conviction; and the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, ^tliis court is without authority to interfere. Bor a ease similar in several material respects, see Garner v. State, 100 Ga. 257 (28 S. E. 24).

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garner v. State
28 S.E. 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.E. 815, 24 Ga. App. 654, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-v-state-gactapp-1920.